PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK OLEH HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERKAIT DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 90/PUU-XXI/2023

Ignas Riez Bria; I Nyoman Suandika; Kadek Dedy Suryana

doi:10.59003/nhj.v4i4.1227

Authors

Ignas Riez Bria Universitas Mahendradatta
I Nyoman Suandika Universitas Mahendradatta
Kadek Dedy Suryana Universitas Mahendradatta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59003/nhj.v4i4.1227

Keywords:

Code of Ethics, Judges, Constitutional Court, Violations, Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court

Abstract

Judges who act as executors and spearheads of justice and interact with the public are expected to have high professionalism in considering and making legal decisions in a case. In carrying out their duties, a judge is required to comply with the applicable code of ethics. When a judge violates the professional code of ethics, he will be given sanctions according to the violation he has committed. The case of violating the code of ethics that recently occurred was the case regarding Anwar Usman as Chairman of the Constitutional Court who was proven to have violated the professional code of ethics for judges in relation to Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. The aim of this research is to find out the accountability of a judge who has violated the professional code of ethics and to know the role of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court in handling cases of violations of the code of ethics committed by constitutional judges. This research uses a normative juridical method by referring to legal norms contained in statutory regulations as well as legal norms that exist in society. An approach that refers to applicable laws and regulations including principles, principles and doctrine. Judges who violate the code of ethics can impose three types of sanctions taking intoaccount the background, level of seriousness and consequences of the violation. The Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court is an instrument formed by the Constitutional Court with the aim of maintaining and upholding honor, nobility and dignity. The authority possessed by the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court includes maintaining the dignity and honor of the Constitutional Court, examining and deciding on allegations of violations of the code of ethics and behavior of constitutional judges. The trial led by Jimly Asshiddiqie as Chair of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court (MKMK) through the Decision of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court Number 02/MKMK/L/11/2923 stated that Anwar Usman in this case had been proven to have violated the code of professional ethics and behavior of judges. For this reason, Anwar Usman was dismissed from his position as Chairman of the Constitutional Court.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad Faujan. 2009. Perundang-undangan Lengkap Tentang Peradilan Umum, Peradilan Khusus, dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Kencana.

A. Mukthie Fadraj. 2006. Hukum Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MK RI.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2005. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2006. Perihal Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press dan Syaami Cipta Media.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2012. Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional Di Berbagai Negara. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2014. Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Budiardjo, Miriam. 2018. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

C.S.T. Kansil. (2018). Hukum Tata Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Departemen Pendididkan dan Kebudayaan. 1989. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Imam Mahdi. 2011. Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Cetakan I. Yogyakarta: Teras.

Indroharto. 2014. Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik, dalam Paulus Efendie Lotulung, Himpunan Makalah Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Ismail, Nur Hasan. 2007. Perkembangan Hukum Pertanahan, Pendekatan Ekonomi – Politik. Yogjakarta: HUMA dan Magister Hukum UGM.

King Faisal Sulaiman. 2017. Teori Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan Aspek Pengujiannya. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media.

Lon L. Fuller. 1964. The Morality of Law. McGraw-Hill: Yale University Press.

Mardiasmo. 2022. Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Maruarar siahaan. 2011. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

M. Khozim. 2009. Sistem Hukum Perspektif Ilmu Sosial. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Moh. Mahfud MD. 2010. Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakan Konstitusi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2008. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Putera Astomo. 2018. Ilmu Perundang-undangan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. 2009. Negara Hukum Yang Membahagiakan Rakyatnya. Jakarta: Genta Publishing.

Rimdan, NFN. 2012. Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Satjipto Rahardjo. 2012. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sibuea, Hotma P. 2020. Asas Negara Hukum, Peraturan Kebijakan dan Asas-asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik. Surabaya: Erlangga.

Soeprapto, Maria Farida Indrati. 2007. Ilmu Perundang-undangan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Soeroso. 2011. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Soedikno Mertokusumo. 2010. Penemuan Hukum. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya.

Supriadi. 2006. Etika Dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Tarmizi. 2019. Kode Etik Profesi Tentang Hukum: Polisi, Hakim, Jaksa, Advokad/Penasehat Hukum, Pegawai Pemasyarakatan, Notaris, Kpk (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi), Paniteradan Juru Sita, Arbiter Dan Mediator, Dan Intelijen Negara. Jakarta timur: Sinar Grafika.

Tim Penyusun Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. 2010. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Kosntitusi. Jakarta: Sekretaris Jendral Dan Kepaniteraan MK RI.

Wildan, Sayuthi Mustofa. 2013. Kode Etik Hakim. Jakarta: Kencana.

Winanrno, Nur Basuki. 2018. Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Mediatama.

Zainuddin Ali. 2014. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Pasal 1 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) UU No 12 tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Repuplik Indonesia Nomor 02 Tahun 2014 Tentang Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi

Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Nomor, 009/Pmk/2006 Tentang Pemberlakuan Deklarasi Kode Etik Dan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi.

Undang-undang Nomor 07 Tahun 2020 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Andriani, D., Juliansyah, R., Wiratanaya, G. N., Sari, D. P., Pidada, I. B. A., Purwaningrum, H., … & Adelia, S., 2022, Perencanaan Pariwisata.

Farhan, R. F., dkk. 2023. Etika Hakim dalam Menegakkan Keadilan Menurut Perspektif Etika Plato. Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, 1 (1), 1-25.

Miftachul, M., & Sri, A. 2023. Sanksi Hukum Bagi Hakim Yang Melanggar Kode Etik Profesi. Jurnal Justitia, 6 (2), 500-507

Rabiatul Adawiah Zahra. 2018. Efektifitas Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi Oleh Dewan Etik Dan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitisi. Skripsi. Jakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.

Sudirman., Hasanuddin, H., & Abdul, H. 2019. Implementasi Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim di PTUN Makassar. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 14 (2), 179-199.

Suandika, I. Nyoman, and I. Gusti Ngurah Wirasatya. (2021). Fungsi Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dalam Melaksanakan Pembinaan Terhadap Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan (Wbp) Studi Penulisan Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Perempuan Kelas Iia Denpasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha 4 (1), 71-81.