IDENTIFIKASI STATUS PERLINDUNGAN ANAK MENGGUNAKAN ALGORITMA KLASIFIKASI K-NEAREST NEIGHBORS

Muh Jabal Nur; Tri Wahyudi Budi  Sastra; Muhammad  Faisal

doi:10.59003/nhj.v1i12.310

Authors

Muh Jabal Nur STMIK Profesional Makassar
Tri Wahyudi Budi Sastra STMIK Profesional Makassar
Muhammad Faisal STMIK Profesional Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59003/nhj.v1i12.310

Keywords:

knn, child protection, classification, algorithm, NGOs, identification.

Abstract

The United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) has defined the child protection system as “certain formal and informal structures, functions and capacities that have been pooled to prevent and respond to violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation of children”. Problems identified by the Sulawesi Community Foundation group (CSF) is the absence of digital records that accommodate the results of direct interviews with children in terms of measuring experiences or actions that have been experienced by a child as a source of information that can be used for decision-making needs. The KNN algorithm is one of the most popular data mining algorithms. It has been widely and successfully applied to data analysis applications across various research topics in computer science. Based on the value of Classification Y, obtained as much as 1 data Category = Unprotected, and 3 data Category = Protected, then the resulting decision is that the identification of child protection status in an area is based on attribute values X1=5, X2=3, X3=50 and X4 = Does not result in a decision that the majority of children have guaranteed protection status. The decisions made are in accordance with the facts, therefore the Sulawesi Community Foundation NGO can apply the results of analysis and testing into an integrated system so that it can become a valid source of information in digital format.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. G. Wessells, “Bottom-up approaches to strengthening child protection systems: Placing children, families, and communities at the center,” Child Abuse Negl., vol. 43, pp. 8–21, May 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.04.006.

F. Middel, W. Post, M. López López, and H. Grietens, “Participation of Children Involved in the Child Protection System – Validation of the Meaningful Participation Assessment Tool (MPAT),” Child Indic. Res., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 713–735, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12187-020-09772-2.

J. Tobin and J. Cashmore, “Thirty years of the CRC: Child protection progress, challenges and opportunities,” Child Abuse Negl., vol. 110, p. 104436, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104436.

S. Zhang, “Challenges in KNN Classification,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 2021, doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2021.3049250.