ANALISIS POTENSI PENINGGALAN SUMBER DAYA ARKEOLOGI DAN PEMANFAATANNYA SEBAGAI SUMBER BELAJAR SEJARAH SMA DI KABUPATEN BANYUWANGI
Keywords:
eritage, archeology, learning resourcesAbstract
Traces of past human life activities can be seen in cultural remains such as artifacts, features and ecofacs. The cultural remains found today are also referred to as archaeological resources. We have to explore the potential of these archaeological traces or remains so that we can bring them back as a learning resource. Banyuwangi Regency is rich in archaeological heritage that can be used as an alternative source of learning from existing books. This study tries to analyze these relics and present them into the history learning of senior high schools in Banyuwangi. The results show that the archaeological remains in Banyuwangi are very complete from prehistoric times to modern history. However, the history teacher at senior high school did not explore these relics with various obstacles, ranging from difficulties in integrating materials and financial problems which were large enough to invite students to places that had archaeological remains. This study provides an overview of the subject matter that can be integrated according to the 2013 curriculum and the findings of archaeological remains in Banyuwangi as a learning resource.
Downloads
References
Fuad Mulyadi Nazir, 2005. Pengaruh Srategi Pembelajaran Ekspositori Dan Inkuiri Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Kelistrikan Otomotif Ditinjau Dari Motifasi Berprestasi Dan Pemanfaatan Sumber Belajar (Eksperimen Pada Siswa Kelas 2 SMK di Kabupaten Sragen). Surakarta: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Hanafi, A.M. 1996. Menteng 31: Markas Pemuda Revolusioner Angkatan 45: Membangun Jembatan Dua Angkatan. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan
Latuheru, John D. 1988.Media Pembelajaran dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar Masa Kini. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Third edition. USA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Nasution, S. 1996, Metode Penelitian Naturalistik-Kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.
Patton, MQ. 1983. Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills: CA. Sage Publications
Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Sutopo, H. B. 2006. Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar Teori dan terapannya Dalam Penelitian. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Sadiman, Arief W.,dkk. 1996. Media Pendidikan; Pengertian, Pengembangan, dan Pemanfaatannya. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Setijadi. 1986.Definisi Teknologi Pendidikan:Satuan Tugas Definisi dan Terminologi AECT.Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Sutardhi,SD.1981. ”Pemanfaatan Alam Sekitar Sebagai Sumber Belajar Anak”. Analisis Pendidikan. Depdikbud.Jakarta.Tahun II.
Stanov Purnawibowo dan Lucas Partanda Koestoro. Analisis Stakeholders Dalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Arkeologi Di Kota Cina, Medan. AMERTA, Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Arkeologi Vol. 34 No. 1, Juni 2016 : 1-80
Ni Komang Ayu Astiti. 2016. Sumber Daya Arkeologi Dalam Pembangunan Pariwisata Berkelanjutan Di Provinsi Maluku, Jakarta : Kementerian Pariwisata
Vicky G.Spencer, Bonnie B.Carter, Richard T.Boon & Cynthia Garcia-Simpson. 2002. If You Teach-You Teach Reading. www.internationaljournalofspecialeducation.com. (diakses 20 oktober 2009 14:00 WIB).
Wina Sanjaya. 2008.Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 I Kadek Yudiana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
NHJ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles in this journal are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA License This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work and source is properly cited.
Any derivative of the original must be distributed under the same license as the original.