PERBANDINGAN HASIL PEMBUBUTAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MATA PAHAT KARBIDA DAN MATA PAHAT HSS DI BENGKEL POLMUH

Authors

  • Auly Fatkhur Hidayat Politeknik Muhammadiyah Tegal
  • Muhamad Zainudin Politeknik Muhammadiyah Tegal
  • Sudarmono Politeknik Muhammadiyah Tegal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59003/nhj.v2i10.790

Keywords:

Lathe, Carbide Chisel, HSS Chisel.

Abstract

In the fast-paced period, human desire to produce and compete quickly, efficiently and economically, became the basis for the development of tools and machine tools, the competition provided the main motivation in making machine tools that have accuracy, accuracy and precision, so as to make shape in accordance with the design (model). So in this case what should be considered is how to choose and determine the tool material to be used on a lathe, because it can affect the level of wear on the tool eye itself and the fineness or surface roughness that will be generated can be controlled visually. Comparing the use of carbide chisel with HSS chisel to eat ST 37 steel workpieces, in this study aims to determine the use of chisel blade in order to produce smooth workpiece surface fibers and have a small degree of roughness visually in the turning process of steel workpieces ST 37. The results of testing the use of carbide chisels produce finer surface fibers and visually smaller roughness than HSS chisels, so if you turn the ST 37 steel workpiece you should use carbide chisels to get good results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Society for Metals, 1985. Metallography and Microstructures Ninth edition. ASM, Metal Park, Ohio 44073.

Amstead, B.H, 1993. Teknologi Mekanik. Terjemahan Ir. Sriati Djaprie. Edisi ke

Jilid I. Jakarta : Erlangga

Azhar, M. C. 2014. Analisa Kekasaran Permukaan Benda Kerja dengan Variasi

Jenis Material dan Pahat Potong. Skripsi Bengkulu: Universitas Bengkulu.

Boothroyd, Geoffrey and Winston A. Knigh, Fundamentals of machining and machine tools. 2ndEdition, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996.

Hari Amanto, Daryanto, 1999, Teknologi Ilmu Bahan, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta

Rochim Taufig, Teori dan teknologi proses pemesinan, Higher education development support project, Bandung, 1993.

Rochim, T., 2001, Spesifikasi, Metrologi dan Kontrol Kualitas Geometri, ITB, Bandung.

Syamsir, 1986, Dasar-dasar Perencanaan Perkakas, Rajawali Mas, Jakarta.

Wiryosumarto, H., 2004, Teknologi Pengelasan Logam, PT. Pradya Paramita,Jakarta

Kalpakjian. 2001. “Pengaruh Kekasaran Terhadap Proses Pembubutan”.

Kamil Toha 2014 “ Jenis-jenis pahat pada mesin bubut”.

Khoiri Efendi 2014 “Bagian-bagian Utama Mesin Bubut”.

Daryanto. 2010. Mesin Perkakas. Bandung: Satu Nusa.

Dieter, G. 1986. Metalurgi Mekanik, Jilid 1, Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Paridawati. 2015. Pengaruh Kecepatan dan Sudut Potong terhadap Kekasaran Benda Kerja pada Mesin Bubut, Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Mesin Vol. 03 No 01. Universitas Islam 45 Bekasi.

Rochim. 1993. Spesifikasi, Metrologi, dan Kontrol Kualitas Geometrik. Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung.

Rochim. 2007. Klasifikasi Proses Gaya dan Daya Mesin, Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Mesin. Bandung: FTI ITB.

Schey, J. A. 2000. Introduction to Manufacturing Process. McGraw-Hill.

Sumbodo, W. 2008. Teknik Produksi Mesin Industri. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan.

Widarto. 2008. Teknik Permesinan. Jakarta: Depdiknas

Downloads

Published

2023-03-05

How to Cite

Auly Fatkhur Hidayat, Muhamad Zainudin, & Sudarmono. (2023). PERBANDINGAN HASIL PEMBUBUTAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MATA PAHAT KARBIDA DAN MATA PAHAT HSS DI BENGKEL POLMUH. Nusantara Hasana Journal, 2(10), 122–126. https://doi.org/10.59003/nhj.v2i10.790

Most read articles by the same author(s)