PENGARUH ALOKASI DANA DESA (ADD) TERHADAP PEMBANGUNAN FISIK DESA DAN PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT DI DESA ADAT BUALU KECAMATAN KUTA SELATAN, KABUPATEN BADUNG

Maria Yudita Diwun; Putu Ratna Windusara Putri; I Made Sujana; Dessy Widyanasari

Authors

Maria Yudita Diwun Universitas Teknologi Indonesia
Putu Ratna Windusara Putri Universitas Teknologi Indonesia
I Made Sujana Universitas Teknologi Indonesia
Dessy Widyanasari Universitas Teknologi Indonesia

Keywords:

Village Fund Allocation (ADD), Village Physical Development and Community Empowerment

Abstract

The Village Fund Allocation is a fund from the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget given to villages. The implementation of village fund allocation based on the act is intended in two fields, namely for development and community empowerment. However, in its implementation there are still shortcomings that are owned by village officials in the field of human resources that manage and technology used by villages. Good allocation of village fund can actually improve development village. This study aims to determine the effect of village fund allocation on physical and non-physical development in the area of Desa Adat Bualu, South Kuta District, Badung Regency, Bali. This study were used a quantitative approach, with a total sampel of 96 head of family from 2.646 households with purposive sampling method. Which is used based on the source is primary data and secondary data, using Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) analysis technique. The results of the research using statistical t-test showed that the t-statistic and P-Value were previously known that 1) Village fund allocation was positive and had a significant effect on the physical development of the village, which was indicated by the P-Value = 0,000 < 0,05. The results of the hypothesis test show that the t-statistic value is 11,784, which means that there is a positive influence of village fund allocation on village physical development. 2) Village fund allocation is positive and has a significant effect on community empowerment, which is indicated by the P-Value = 0,000 < 0,05. The results of the hypotests test show that the t-statistic value is 9,101 which means that there is a positive influence of village fund allocation on community empowerment. 3) Simultaneous Village Fund Allocation has a positive and significant effect on village physical development and community empowerment, which is indicated by the P-Value = 0,000 < 0,05. This means that balance is important in the development of a region, it is not olny carrying out development programs that are engeged in non-physical development, namely community empowerment. Village funds are the main capital for developing villages and prospering the community nonphysical. Better allocation of village funds will have a positive balance in village physical development and community empowerment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi, A. Uhbiyani N, 2001, Ilmu Pendidikan, Jakarta: Reneka Cipta.

Akbar, 2014, Peran Kepala Desa Dalam Meningkatkan Pembangunan Fisik di Desa Selangkau Kecamatan Kaliorang Kabupaten Kutai Timur, Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 2: 2

Alexander, M, 1994, Biodegradation and Bioremediation, New York: Academic Press.

Ambar, T, 2004, Kemitraan dan Mode-model Pemberdayaan, Yogyakarta: Gala Media.

A.M.W. Pranarka, V. Moeljarto, 1996, Pemberdayaan (Empowerment), Pemberdayaan Konsep, Kebijakan Implementasi, Jakarta: CSIS.

Astute, Titiek Puji, Yulianto, 2016, Good Governance Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa Menyongsong Berlakunya Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 2014, Berkala Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 1: 1-14.

Bambang Herianto, 2018. Pengaruh Alokasi Dana Desa (ADD) Terhadap Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa Raden Anom Kecamatan Batang Asai Kabupaten Sarolangun (Skripsi), Jambi: Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi.

Desi Hariyani, 2018. Pengaruh Alokasi Dana Desa Terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Desa (Studi kasus di desa Sungai Rambut Kecamatan Berbak Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur) (Skripsi), Jambi: Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi.

Deves, N, 1989, Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesian, Jakarta: UI-Pers.

Effendi, B, 2002, Pembangunan Ekonomi Daerah Berkeadilan, Yogyakarta: Kurnia Kalam Semesta.

Fajri, Rahmi, Endah Setyowati, Siswidiyanto, 2014, Akuntabilitas Pemerintah Desa Pada Pengelolaan Alokasi Dana Desa (ADD) (Studi Pada Kantor Desa Ketindan, Kecamatan Lawang, Kabupaten Malang), Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 3: 7.

Firmansyah, H, 2012, Ketercapaian Indikator Keberdayaan Masyarakat Dalam Program Pemberdayaan Fakir Miskin (P2FM) di Kota Banjarmasin, Jurnal Agribisnis Perdesaan, 2 (2): 172-180.

Gasper, R & Annette Davies, 2016, Revisiting the Potential of Community Empowerment Within UK Neighbourhood Policing Meetings, Journal Policing and Society, 1-19.

Kartasasmita, G, 1994, Manajemen Pembangunan Untuk Negara Berkembang, Jakarta: PT. Glora Aksara Pratama.

Kede, E.E.R, 2019, Pengaruh Alokasi Dana Desa Terhadap Pemberdayaan Masyarakatn (Studi di Desa Pandarejo Kecamatan Bumiaji Kota Batu), Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 8 (4): 333-33.

Lemhanas, 1997, Pembangunan Nasional, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Permendagri Nomor 113 tahun 2014 Tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa Pasal 2 ayat 1.

Pigg, K.E, 2002, Three Faces of Empowerment: Expanding the Theory of Empowerment in Community Development, Journal of the Community Development Society, 33 (1).

Porter, E, 2013, Rethinking Women’s Empowerment, Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 8 (1): 1-14.

PP No. 72 Tahun 2005 Revisi UU No. 6 tahun 2014 Tentang Desa.

Sandoval, Gerardo & Jane Rongerude, 2015, Telling a Story That Must Be Heard: Participatory Indicators as Tools for Community Empowerment, Journal of Community Practice.

Shinn, J, 2013, The rhetoric and reality of community empowerment in coastal conservation: a case study from Menai Bay Conservation Area, Tanzania, African Geographical Review, 34 (2): 107-124.

Siagian, S.P, 2003, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta: Bumi Akarsa.

Soehartono, I, 2004, Metode Penelitian Sosial, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono, 2006, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta.

-----------, 2007, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta.

----------, 2013, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

----------, 2016, Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

Sukirno, S, 2009, Pengantar Teori Makro Ekonomi, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sumodiningrat, G, 2000, Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan JPS, Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Suparno, A, S, 2001, Membangun Kompetisi Dasar, Jakarta: Direktorat jendral Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Suparjan & Hempri, S, 2003, Pembangunan Masyarakat Dari Pembangunan Sampai Pemberdayaan, Yogyakarta: Aditya Media.

Surat Edaran Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 140/640/SJ Tahun 2005 tentang Pedoman Alokasi Dana Desa dari Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota Kepada Pemerintah Desa.

Surat Menteri Dalam Negeri Tanggal 22 Maret 2003 Nomor 140/640/SJ Prihal Pedoman Alokasi Dana Desa dari Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota Kepada Pemerintah Desa.

Tikson, D, T, 2005, Administrasi Pembangunan, Makasar: Gemilang Persada.

Tulusan, Famy M.G, Very Y. Landa, 2014, Peningkatan Pendapatan Masyarakat Melalui program Pemberdayaan di Desa Lolah II Kecamatan Tombariri Kabupaten Minahasa, Jurnal LPPM Bidang EkoSosBudKum, 1 (1).

UU Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa.

UU Nomor 34 Tahun 2000 Tentang Perubahan Atas UU No. 18 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pajak daerah dan Retribusi Daerah.

UU Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemerintah Desa.

Winarni, T, 1998, Memahami Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa Partisifatif dalam Orientasi Pembangunan Masyarakat Menyongsong Abad 2: Menuju Pemberdayaan Pelayanan Masyarakat, Yogyakarta: Aditya Media.

Wrihatnolo, & Dwidjowijoto, 2017, Manajemen Pemberdayaan, Jakarta: PT Alex Media Komputindo.