KERENTANAN SOSIAL TERHADAP BENCANA DI KABUPATEN BANTUL PROVINSI D.I. YOGYAKARTA

Authors

  • Annisa Mu'awanah Sukmawati Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta
  • Puji Utomo Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta

Keywords:

Bantul Regency, Social Vulnerability, Rural Areas, Urban Areas

Abstract

Vulnerability refers to the inability of a system to deal with threats that can be affected by physical, social, and economic conditions. Bantul Regency is a disaster-prone area due to its natural physical condition and population which could increase disaster risk. Disaster risk could increase in line with high vulnerability but low adaptive capacity. The study aims to assess the condition of social vulnerability in urban and rural areas in Bantul Regency. The study covered 75 sub-districts in Bantul Regency. The study was conducted using quantitative analysis through factor analysis using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) techniques and mapping analysis. Data collection was carried out by reviewing documents to collect information and data related to indicators of population density, the number of people per household, the proportion of women, children under five, the elderly, and poor people. The study revealed that rural areas tend to have higher social vulnerability than urban areas. This is due to inadequate social and economic conditions. Although the population density is relatively low, rural areas have economic conditions and a high population dependency rate. The proximity of the location to urban areas also affects the level of vulnerability. A strategy for disaster risk reduction is needed from stakeholders by observing the spatial distribution of vulnerabilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, I. Davies, and B. Wisner, At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disaster. London: Routledge, 1994.

S. L. Cutter, B. J. Boruff, and W. L. Shirley, “Social vulnerability to environmental hazards,” Soc. Sci. Q., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 242–261, 2003, doi: 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002.

W. Adiyoso, Manajemen Bencana Pengantar Isu-Isu Strategis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2018.

W. N. Adger, “Vulnerability,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 268–281, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006.

IPCC, Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

B. Smit and J. Wandel, “Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 282–292, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008.

W. Chen, S. L. Cutter, C. T. Emrich, and P. Shi, “Measuring Social Vulnerability to Natural Hazards in the Yangtze River Delta Region, China,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 169–181, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s13753-013-0018-6.

B. M. de Loyola Hummell, S. L. Cutter, and C. T. Emrich, “Social Vulnerability to Natural Hazards in Brazil,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 111–122, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s13753-016-0090-9.

K. A. Borden, M. C. Schmidtlein, C. T. Emrich, W. W. Piegorsch, and S. L. Cutter, “Vulnerability of U.S. cities to environmental hazards,” J. Homel. Secur. Emerg. Manag., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–21, 2007, doi: 10.2202/1547-7355.1279.

I. S. Holand, P. Lujala, and J. K. Rod, “Social vulnerability assessment for Norway: A quantitative approach,” Nor. Geogr. Tidsskrif-Norwegian J. Geogr., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2011, doi: 10.1080/00291951.2010.550167.

Y. Ge, W. Dou, X. Wang, Y. Chen, and Z. Zhang, “Identifying urban–rural differences in social vulnerability to natural hazards: a case study of China,” Nat. Hazards, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 2629–2651, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-04792-9.

M. Pelling and D. Mustafa, “Vulnerability, Disasters and Poverty in Desakota Systems,” UK, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/research-for-development-outputs/final-report-desakota-part-ii-b-vulnerability-disasters-and-poverty-in-desakota-systems#citation.

X. Gao, H. Yuan, W. Qi, and S. Liu, “Assessing the social economic vulnerability of urban areas to disasters: A case study in Beijing, China,” Int. Rev. Spat. Plan. Sustain. Dev., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 42–62, 2014, doi: 10.14246/irspsd.2.1_42.

P. Dasgupta et al., “Rural Areas,” in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, J. Agard, E. L. F. Schipper, J. Birkmann, M. Campos, and C. Dubeux, Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 613–657.

J. A. Cross, “Megacities and small towns: Different perspectives on hazard vulnerability,” Environ. Hazards, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 63–80, 2001, doi: 10.3763/ehaz.2001.0307.

BPBD Kabupaten Bantul, Dokumen Kajian Risiko Bencana Kabupaten Bantul Tahun 2013-2017. Kabupaten Bantul: BPBD Kabupaten Bantul, 2017.

BPBD DIY, “DIBI Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 2020,” Yogyakarta, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://bpbd.jogjaprov.go.id/assets/public/DIBI Yogya_2020.pdf.

A. Jamshed, J. Birkmann, D. Feldmeyer, and I. A. Rana, “A conceptual framework to understand the dynamics of rural-urban linkages for rural flood vulnerability,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 2894, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12072894

Downloads

Published

2022-07-02

How to Cite

Sukmawati, A. M., & Utomo, P. (2022). KERENTANAN SOSIAL TERHADAP BENCANA DI KABUPATEN BANTUL PROVINSI D.I. YOGYAKARTA . Nusantara Hasana Journal, 2(2), 418–429. Retrieved from https://nusantarahasanajournal.com/index.php/nhj/article/view/441