ANALISIS PENGGUNAAN SISTEM E-KINERJA GURU DI SMK NEGERI 3 GOWA

Authors

  • Khairunnisa Khairunnisa Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Syamsu Kamaruddin Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Sumarlin Mus Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59003/nhj.v5i2.1537

Keywords:

Performance, Teachers, Vocational Schools

Abstract

Digital transformation in the education sector has become a necessity in the modern era, especially in supporting the improvement of performance and accountability of educators through the application of information technology. The e-Performance system is present as an important innovation to record, monitor, and evaluate teacher performance more objectively, transparently, and in real-time, but its implementation still faces various challenges in various regions, including in the Vocational High School (SMK) environment which has a higher complexity of tasks compared to public schools. This study aims to identify and analyze the process of using the e-Performance system by teachers at SMKN 3 Gowa, with a focus on teachers' understanding of the system, filling in Employee Performance Targets (SKP) electronically, and implementing digital-based monitoring and evaluation. This study used a qualitative approach with a descriptive research type, which allowed researchers to explore experiences, perceptions, and dynamics that occur in field practice in depth, through data collection techniques such as in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation involving the principal, vice principal for curriculum, and teachers as key informants. The results of the study showed significant variations in the level of teacher understanding of the e-Performance system, where some teachers, especially younger ones, were able to operate the application relatively smoothly, while others, especially older teachers or those with low digital literacy, experienced difficulties in accessing and utilizing important features in the system. Filling out the SKP electronically was identified as a fairly complex process, with many teachers admitting confusion in setting performance targets according to indicators and experiencing technical obstacles that impacted the validity of the input data. In addition, monitoring and evaluation of teacher performance through the e-Performance system at SMKN 3 Gowa has not been optimally utilized due to limited time for school management, technical obstacles such as unstable internet connections, and a low digital data-based work culture within the school environment. These findings confirm that although the e-Performance system has been implemented, its effectiveness in supporting teacher performance management still requires more structured interventions, both in terms of improving teachers' digital competencies, refining the system's technical features, and formulating evidence-based monitoring policies. The contribution of this research lies in enriching the literature related to the implementation of technology-based performance management in vocational schools, especially in the relatively underexplored Eastern Indonesia region, as well as providing practical recommendations for policymakers and schools in formulating strategies to optimize the e-Performance system so that it truly functions as an instrument for improving professionalism and the quality of educational services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdiyantoro, M., Handayani, S., & Nurul, L. (2024). Pengaruh Digitalisasi Administrasi terhadap Kinerja Guru di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen (JEM), 9 (1), 45-56. https://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/JEM/article/view/13734

Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing Ethnographic and Observational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 10 (2), 186–205. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1094428106295502

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2), 27–40. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/160940690900800408

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 20 (2), 123–145. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049732314543197

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Qualitative Health Research, 28 (2), 273–283. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049732318759664

DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40 (4), 314–321. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049732305285972

Edwards-Jones, A. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. SAGE Open, 4 (1), 1–2. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244014522633

Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, Article 117. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049732313502128

Handayani, S., Supriyanto, E., & Abdullah, M. (2022). Implementasi Sistem E-Kinerja Guru di SMK: Tantangan dan Strategi Penyelesaian. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 29 (2), 115-128. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/administrasi/article/view/51918

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2020). Professional capital after the pandemic: Revisiting and revising classic understandings of teachers’ work. Review of Educational Research, 90 (4), 681–722. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3102/0034654320938126

Haryanto, B., Sari, L. P., & Nur, L. (2023). Manajemen Kinerja Digital dalam Sektor Pendidikan: Studi Implementasi e-Kinerja. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 15 (1), 21–34. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/article/view/58827

Huang, F., Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2021). Factors affecting teachers’ adoption of educational technology in China: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 723389. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.723389/full

Imelda, D. (2024). Sistem Manajemen Kinerja Berbasis Digital di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 16 (1), 55–67. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/article/view/58832

Khairunnisa. (2025). Analisis Penggunaan Sistem E-Kinerja Guru di SMKN 3 Gowa. Universitas Negeri Makassar Institutional Repository. https://repository.unm.ac.id/

Klein, E., Liu, Y., & Ye, Z. (2021). Digital transformation in education: Challenges and strategies in performance management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49 (1), 133–152. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1741143220984894

Kwak, S. Y., Han, I., & Kim, S. H. (2022). The relationship between teachers’ digital literacy and the effectiveness of e-performance systems. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 543–560. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-022-11323-9

Liu, J., Chen, X., & Zhang, L. (2023). Big data analytics in educational administration: Trends and applications. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1132178. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1132178/full

Maharani, L., Suwandi, A., & Pramono, R. (2022). Evaluasi Sistem e-Kinerja dalam Lembaga Pendidikan: Studi Kualitatif di SMK. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen (JEM), 7(2), 89–102. https://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/JEM/article/view/12624

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19 (4), 489–490. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1609406915617431

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Open, 4 (1), 1–9. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244014564950

Morse, J. M. (2000). Determining Sample Size. Qualitative Health Research, 10 (1), 3–5. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/104973200129118183

Nurul, L., Handayani, S., & Supriyanto, E. (2021). Digital Literacy and Teacher Readiness in Implementing e-Performance Systems. Jurnal Edukasi, 28 (3), 212–225. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/edukasi/article/view/47013

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Organizational Research Methods, 18 (4), 581–599. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1094428115621140

Pokhrel, S. (2024). Digital Transformation and Educational Administration: Insights from Developing Contexts. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1172210. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1172210/full

Rahmatullah, R., Haryanto, B., & Sari, L. P. (2023). Implementasi e-Kinerja di Sekolah Kejuruan: Studi Kasus di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 15 (2), 78–91. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/article/view/58823

Rashid, S., & Wahid, N. (2022). Evidence-based performance evaluation in education: A review of digital tools. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 836841. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2022.836841/full

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2013). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. SAGE Open, 3 (1), 1–3. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124112464861

Rohayani, E., Saputra, A., & Prihatiningsih, T. (2023). Transformasi Digital dalam Platform Merdeka Mengajar: Peluang dan Tantangan. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI), 12 (1), 55–67. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPI/article/view/56714

Silalahi, B., Ramadhan, D., & Sitorus, R. (2023). Analisis Kendala Digitalisasi Administrasi Sekolah di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 15 (2), 92–105. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/article/view/58828

Suharti, N., Widodo, W., & Sari, L. P. (2024). Optimalisasi Sistem e-Kinerja Guru: Perspektif Kepala Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI), 13 (1), 34–45. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPI/article/view/58820

Teknis, S., Mahardika, H., & Anggraeni, Y. (2023). Analisis Pemanfaatan Data e-Kinerja untuk Pengambilan Keputusan. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 15 (3), 150–164. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/article/view/58829

Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2021). Teachers’ information and communication technology use: A multilevel analysis of the role of teacher, school, and country characteristics. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 678394. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.678394/full

Tran, L. T., Nguyen, N. H., & Vo, T. T. (2022). Digital Performance Management Systems in Southeast Asia: A Sociocultural Perspective. Quality & Quantity, 56, 89–105. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11135-021-01196-4

Ulmadevi, A., Sari, L. P., & Rahmatullah, R. (2023). Digital Performance Management and Teacher Discipline: An Indonesian Perspective. Jurnal Pedagogi, 21(2), 145–159. https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/pedagogi/article/view/117952

Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 11 (4), 522–537. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/104973201129119892

Zhang, X., Li, Y., & Huang, J. (2021). Digital transformation and performance management: Toward a theoretical framework. Journal of Business Communication, 58 (4), 598–616. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00219436211036052

Downloads

Published

2025-07-30

How to Cite

Khairunnisa, K., Syamsu Kamaruddin, & Sumarlin Mus. (2025). ANALISIS PENGGUNAAN SISTEM E-KINERJA GURU DI SMK NEGERI 3 GOWA. Nusantara Hasana Journal, 5(2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.59003/nhj.v5i2.1537